A
AGarcia
Baneado
Sin verificar
Gracias por responder, Goldtyson.
Añado, para que quede todo bien claro, un extracto de las especificaciones de la ISO 6425, donde la frase en rojo evidencia que es ridículo excluir a un digital por no llevar bisel giratorio:
Besides water resistance standards to a minimum of 100 metres (330 ft) depth rating ISO 6425 also provides minimum requirements for mechanical diver's watches (quartz and digital watches have slightly differing readability requirements) such as:[3]
* The presence of a time-preselecting device, for example a unidirectional rotating bezel or a digital display. Such a device shall be protected against inadvertent rotation or wrong manipulation. If it is a rotating bezel, it shall have a minute scale going up to 60 min. The markings indicating every 5 min shall be clearly indicated. The markings on the dial, if existing, shall be coordinated with those of the preselecting device and shall be clearly visible. If the preselecting device is a digital display, it shall be clearly visible.
* The following items of the watch shall be legible at a distance of 25 cm (9.8 in) in the dark:
o time (the minute hand shall be clearly distinguishable from the hour hand);
o set time of the time-preselecting device;
o indication that the watch is running (This is usually indicated by a running second hand with a luminous tip or tail.);
o in the case of battery-powered watches, a battery end-of-life indication
Y si, yo prefiero mil veces antes un Sub a un Frogman, pero no hablamos de éso. Simplemente de si están o no certificados por la ISO.
Un saludo!!
Es que la luminova en los digitales es muy dificil de colgar, no es por no tener bisel